🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.